The formation a team uses influences the way the team plays, whether that be defensive or attacking. I've outlined the pros and cons of each below:
131:
Midfield biased formation. Can overwhelm formations with width and numbers in midfield. Defence vulnerable to formations with more than one attacker. Effective against "narrow" formations.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
113:
Attack biased formation. Lack of width and numbers in midfield and defence make it vulnerable. Effective against "narrow" formations.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
311:
Defensive biased formation. Lack of width and numbers in midfield and attack make it difficult to score. Effective against "narrow" formations.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
122:
Narrow formation with 1 man defence. Vulnerable to wide formations. Can overwhelm other formations in midfield and attack.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
221:
Narrow formation with 1 man attack. Vulnerable to wide formations. Can overwhelm other formations in midfield and defence.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
212:
Narrow formation. Vulnerable to wide formations. Effective against formations with one in defence.
No comments:
Post a Comment